Leadership. Matters More Than Ever
Why certain businesses managed to cope better than others? The answer to the questions involves tremendous different variables that played a role in the success to continue and cope with the drastic changes that resulted from the pandemic, but one most vital variable that sticks out amongst them is the leadership style.
Some of the most common leadership styles where leaders find themselves fall into are:
- Autocratic: rigid, but excellent when speed of decision-making and execution is needed.
- Charismatic: has vision and can influence and inspire others.
- Transformational: often focuses on productivity and influencing people to work harder.
- Laissez-faire: allows a high level of autonomy and encourages team members to solve problems themselves.
- Transactional: roles are well-defined and structure enables progression in employees.
- Supportive: provides employees with the skills, support and coaching to succeed.
- Democratic: does everything by committee, involving everyone.
Despite the fact that some leaders would have more than just one style, they often find themselves fall more into one than the other, but what leadership styles has worked with the new ways of work and what hasn’t?
The leadership styles that have better leverage to thrive during the crisis are:
The Charismatic
The one to find new opportunities and inspire a team to work hard to chase them down. This leader will always find few new opportunities, get his team to follow them all and then really pin down the two with the most potential to be successful, creating a true new opportunity out of emerging circumstances.
The Transformational
Works best in organization where the opportunities are clearly established, this leader focuses on what is in hand and drive it forward by encouraging hard work and focus. These leaders take lesser risks than Charismatic leaders, but once they know where they are going, they follow one path religiously as productivity is the name of their game.
The Supportive
The Supportive leader will take a different track from Transformational leader. However, the end result is the same: an appropriately skilled team working towards a common goal., focusing on how everyone can maximize the opportunities in hand. Ensuring that the professional and personal needs of the employees are well considered, with a focus on their mental wellbeing.
The Democratic
Many organizations are led by this leadership group and where a true Democratic leader is functioning, it will most likely result in successful outcomes during the lockdown as the teams are fully involved in the response to the crisis.
Keeping in mind that Leaders often have a mix of styles leading teams and a good leader will engage different styles to successfully lead their group in emerging circumstances, the following leaders have struggled a bit on the early stages of the crisis and should focus more on the current situation to adapt new technics to go through the crises:
The Laissez-faire
These are brave leaders who look at their team and decides that they are more than capable of solving their own problems. However, this may have been less helpful during lockdown, especially if an organization is client based, but if clarity of purpose is returning, the Laissez-faire leader’s teams will be tested, later on energized and ready to get stuck in once more, because the team feels that they are in charge of their own destiny.
The Autocratic
Though this leadership style is very much out of place, it truly isn’t. In organizations where big decisions must be made often, it is often the only way to ensure speed. Where the lockdown was undefined, the need for speed dissipated, but now things are picking up. Thus, this type of leadership might be ideal for some organizations and will help them respond quickly to new opportunities as they come.
The Transactional
Though can seem quite outmoded in newer areas of the economy, many employees feel safest in organizations where their steps to progression are clear and their remuneration is firmly on a grid. There has been a great deal of furloughing in transactional leadership organizations. However, once they have climbed over the hump of bringing back furloughed staff, they will be able to prosper again, with renewed energy coming from those returning to work.